| How To Effectively Select | |||
| The Most Prudent Decisions (page 2) | |||
| pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | | < Previous | | Next > | | |||
Decision Beliefs & fallacies Books & software
| Professional decision-making differs from everyday "impromptu" decision-making. Whereas the professional has ample time to consult, delegate and refer so as to guard against the possibility of something having been initially overlooked or forgotten, the everyday non-professional does not. We gotta do what best we can with what we got! And we gotta' do it quick ... on the spot! Everyday decision-making requires us to utilize our assumptions and perceptions, apply them to the immediate world surrounding us, and then watch to see how matters turn out. We adult humans have a powerful little mass resting atop each our shoulders in that we usually get things right ... but still other times, unfortunately, we mess up and learn like children all over again! These next several pages address both types of decision-making. Included is a convenient outline of the decision-making process to help decision-makers avoid the possibility of something inadvertently becoming overlooked. The outline begins on page 5. A. Constraints At the outset, any constraints imposed upon our decision-making may inevitably affect the quality of those final decisions. That is, our conclusions may not be as robustly prepared as we may like if too many problems limit our ability at recognizing ALL possibilities relevant to our problem's resolution within a given time frame. See Avoiding error: Recognizing Hidden Variables for a thorough list. 1. Prior preparation and abilities Impromptu decision-making revolves about what immediately comes to mind. It relies on the validity/accuracy of our prior perceptions and rests solely on the guidance offered by limited memories. We humans prefer to lazily assume validity to all our assumptions and preconceptions without making any effort to "make sure.” We prefer to pre-conceptualize on the spot for each decision we face, because after all daily life won't allow anything less. We certainly don't have the time to ponder over each and e-v-e-r-y decision e-v-e-r-y-d-a-y. We all make these "perceptual" decisions on a daily basis and lots of them! ...little "perceptual points" throughout the day you may say rather than consistently CARING about a host of complicated CAUSES and/or CONSEQUENCES for each and The problem here, of course, is that if we never experienced it or heard about it or in any way imagined it before, well likely not expect it tomorrow. All our planning today for what may confront us tomorrow is ultimately linked to our prior experiences. Prior preparation whether trained, disciplined, self-taught or learned ad hoc ultimately determines most accurately how effectively we may confront and navigate through a novel scenario ... without error. "Blind confidence" tends to lead nowhere. Prior preparation provides the ultimate guarantee for subsequent success ... every time. So, if ya' wanna' avoid any potential for subsequent err, ya' gotta' find somebody who knows how to do the job ... and do it right the first time! Knowledge may be Power, but Competence provides the keys to turn the ignition! And the most competent is always the least likely to err. 2. Time for finding robust solutions Where we may be unprepared, we may be able to consult another who is. But then our resources may be limited and we might be unable to consult a competent authority. If such is the case, we must then resort to intense brainstorming so as to imagine what we may be overlooking. Prior preparation usually leads to immediate solutions, assuming we have sufficient time to carry everything through. Brainstorming where we aren't so adequately prepared in advance, may lead to a solution if we have enough time to imagine, think about and plan for e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. Apparently, time limits all, especially when there is no one else to help us imagine ALL. a. Split-second deciding - instincts and immediate memories
b. Some time available- Star of Sensibilities
c. More time for deciding- Pyramid, Cube, P-I-G
d. Ample time - I-C-E, CRUNCH and others
3. Resources for finding robust solutions Where we may not have the time, we may have the resources ... or vice versa. Any constraints imposed upon our decision-making say in our abilities, prior preparation or time to get things done may be mitigated if we have ample resources to throw about. Two heads are better than one! Where one mind may overlook, the other might recognize and expose. But then where one mind may readily recognize, the other might improve upon and perfect. Access to ample resources is usually what sets the professional apart from the non-professional. Though at times a dedicated and hard-working non-professional may amaze even the most prepared professional who maybe had not contemplated the possibility for such a massive individual effort. In decision-making, "resources" typically refers to the following:
Quite obviously, having ample resources is meaningless if we haven't the means for managing it properly, and decision-making is no exception to this rule. Having ample information is meaningless if we haven't the means to adequately analyze it. Likewise, having ample human resources is meaningless if we consult inappropriately or direct our specialists to work on frivolous assignments. The prospect of avoiding errors in decision-making, even group decision-making, is beset by potential problems that must be effectively managed and navigated around if we endeavor ever to find a final robust solution. The bulk of these problems you may find discussed within this web site, at Avoiding errors. 4. Open-mindedness/creativity to recognize misperceptions See Avoiding error: Problems with human decision-making. If the effectiveness of decision-making rested solely on preparation, time and resources, we wouldn't have much to worry over: We could then just leave all our decision-making to an army of specialists hired collectively by society. Unfortunately, matters aren't so simple. Even groups as large as several hundred still make mistakes! Predominately, this problem rests in our human tendency to assume, and no matter how many of us you assemble if we're all assuming in the same way you'll likely get a final decision with the common assumption(s) built in! This is groupthink, and we decision-makers loathe it. If we could all just learn to keep our minds open to possibilities never hitherto encountered or even considered, if we would just take the time to imagine and consider the possibility of some rare exception having been overlooked and unprepared for rather than automatically limiting our thinking to what had always been practiced or experienced before we might get by a little bit better. We might not have to learn by trial-and-error, by accidents-waiting-to-happen or lawsuits-waiting-to-be-levied. But we're human; we're lazy; and we prefer to learn the old fashioned way; that is, just sit, watch, and see what happens.... | ||
All opinions expressed in this web site, unless otherwise noted, are my own, Michael Gaspard. If you notice any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please let me know by e-mailing webmaster@mdpme.com. Thank you! | |||